Networks -  much is made of 'Social Networks. However, ”group networks” are just as important. Commented on in Barabasi’s book “Linked” - the study of networks has investigated their structure at a level of detail only possible with the use of computer models.

In essence, the types of connection in any network are important. For example, a small network will have a number of strong links, such as a Family, Club or Church and these strong links will hold firm under a lot of social pressure.

On the other hand, they are not much use to the member if faced with a new and novel problem; this is where they use their external contacts to find the help they need. It’s essential in life to have these external connections and these are called weak links.

:

What we experience with community groups such as these is a high degree of isolation when members have very little contact with similar groups - even those within their immediate vicinity. This inevitably means the group does not have opportunities for experiencing or hearing about new ideas.

• It is not a rewarding environment
• It is inward looking when problems arise
• Relies on few reliable volunteers
• It is not widely known
• Has trouble attracting new members.

On the other hand a group with strong internal links and many weak and frequently used links to other groups, will have a wider experience and it will find that it is better known in the community.

• A rewarding environment
•  Is outward looking and has access to others
• Volunteers find the experience rewarding - and they learn something            
• Its well known amongst the community
• It welcomes new members and their  energy and ideas

A well connected Community Group is enjoyable, it's well run and you learn something and contribute